Movies

Are Comic Books Doomed?

admin

Child Reading ComicSuperheroes are EVERYWHERE these days, and I do mean that. Captain America, Iron Man, Batman and Superman dominate the box office, The Flash runs across TV screens everywhere, Spider-Man and his web-slinging friends show up on school bags, T-shirts, notepads and lunch boxes (do kids even use lunchboxes these days? I’ve never actually seen one in my life), hell, images of Ms. Marvel were even used to awesomely deface anti-Muslim propaganda on buses. Literally no matter where you turn, you’re bound to run into a superhero sooner or later! These guys and gals are everywhere, our modern mythologies, the heroes that our children look up to and want to be like. It’s no secret that they came from comic books – I mean, the most popular subgenre in cinema right now is literally called “comic book movies”, but when’s the last time you’ve actually seen someone read a comic book? Like, just sit down on a bench in a park somewhere and read a comic book? Hell, when’s the last time you’ve seen someone actually talk about a comic book, outside of dedicated communities? When did you see one of the people you’re following on Twitter post something along the lines of “Holy crap, #TheVision is crazy! Best series this year, you should read it NOW!” That statement is completely true, but it also never happens – people just don’t talk about comic books the way they talk about comic book movies.

And I’m not pulling those facts out of my behind. Statistically speaking, people are just buying less and less comic books every single month. Wanna compare some numbers? Let’s look at last November’s comic book sales (which actually includes a lot of books released in December, because reasons), where the best selling Marvel comic book, the conclusion of “Civil War II”, sold 120,000 copies. That’s not bad, right? At $5, that’s over half a million in profits! Well, there’s a few things to consider here. This final issue of “Civil War II” is the conclusion of a major event (for reference, the conclusion of the previous “Civil War” sold over twice as much), and one sharing a name with one of the most profitable movies of the year. 120,000 copies is an incredibly low number for something that, under normal circumstances, should have easily sold between 250 and 300 thousand. To add insult to injury, the finale of this super special event that changed the Marvel universe forever was completely overshadowed by both issues of “Batman” released in the same period, which are completely ordinary and have no ties to any major events, outside of marginal connections to DC’s overall “Rebith” theme. The further you go back, the bigger the sales numbers rise. Even in the biggest depressions, people have bought a ton of comic books. Except today, despite the overwhelming presence of superheroes in our popular culture, their mecca lies abandoned.

Why is that, and more importantly, what does it mean for the future of comics? Well, to answer the first question, there’s a couple of reasons. One of them is that both companies (especially Marvel) have begun to rely on gimmicks and cheap hooks rather than on complex storytelling with compelling characters and interesting conflict. What if Captain America was evil? What if Iron Man was a black girl? What if Thor was a woman who had cancer? What if the original X-Men time-travelled to the present and stayed? These gimmicks sometimes provide devices for highly compelling stories (the aforementioned Vision solo series is basically built on the gimmick of “What if the Vision had a family?”, and it is amazing), but most of the time, they’re not enough to keep the reader’s interest. Why should I read about the evil Captain America when he’s doing nothing interesting? Why should I care about the black girl Iron Man when I know Tony Stark will be back in the role in time for the next Avengers movie? These gimmicks provide interesting and fun headlines, but more often than not they’re met with groans from the fans. Some of the best comic book runs of all time (Chris Claremont’s “X-Men”, Ed Brubaker’s “Captain America”, Matt Fraction’s “Hawkeye”, etc) didn’t rely on any gimmicks, they just gave us the characters in their natural habitat and let the stories develop on their own. When Jean Grey died in “X-Men”, we were invested in this because we knew this wasn’t just some kind of ploy to replace her with a young girl of color, it was actually a dramatic, earned moment. We had a reason to care, and to keep on reading. Now there’s no point in reading anything anymore – if you like an old character, you can bet that they’re going to be dying or turning evil sooner or later in order to be replaced, and if you like a new character, unless they’re immensely popular (like the aforementioned Kamala Khan), you’ll know in the back of your mind that they’re not here to stay. So why even bother getting invested in anything in the first place?

DC has been going on the right path here with their Rebirth initiative. They openly came out and said “We know what worked and what didn’t in our previous worlds, and we’re bringing the best of the best back and crafting stories that you want to read”. And trust me, it shows! Aside from the fact that not one, but TWO issues of Batman scored the #1 and #2 spots for sales in November, out of the top 25 top selling books for the month, only 8 were Marvel (and one was Star Wars) – everything else was either DC or third party, like Image’s “The Walking Dead”. Sure, DC still has a whole lot to work towards in order to rebuild that good will they lost since the launch of the New 52 back in 2011, but I believe they’re on the right path. As for Marvel… Well, that’s a bit more complicated. As of right now, Brian Michael Bendis, one of the worst writers currently working in comics, appears to be helming the direction the Marvel universe is taking, and that’s not a good sign at all. There will always be some hope, deep in my heart, that Marvel will change their ways and pull through, but if that doesn’t happen while DC continues to improve, expect me to jump ship and start supporting the company that truly deserves it with my money and attention. Hopefully that’s going to delay the inevitable doom of the comic book genre for at least a little while.

Holiday Gift Suggestions For Gamers

admin

AVS bigAnd once again, the holiday clusterf**k is upon us! With Halloween and Thanksgiving behind us, we’re halfway through this ordeal or torture, but unfortunately we still have Christmas and New Year’s ahead of us (or Hanukah, or whatever it is you celebrate – the occasion doesn’t matter, we all know that holidays are just an excuse to get drunk and get presents), and you know what that means! It’s time to hit your head against the nearest wall trying to wonder exactly what you should purchase for the gamer in your life! It could be a child, a sibling, a boyfriend/girlfriend, a niece/nephew, whatever! Let’s face it – many of us are not gamers, or even if we are, we like certain games and aren’t familiar with every single videogame on the planet. So what should we get the gamers we love? Should we just get them a gift card? Short answer – yes, you absolutely should. Go to GAME, or Gamestop, or whatever your local videogame store is and buy them a £40/$60 gift card so that they can afford to buy one of the many, many releases coming out in a few months, such as “Mass Effect: Andromeda”, “South Park: The Fractured But Whole” and “Persona 5”. Or even better – just give them money so that they can buy whatever they want! There, article over. Moving on, it’s the Top 5 Worst Comic Book Characters From The Silver Age!

Nah, I’m kidding. While a lot of people (especially teenagers) would appreciate money, I can also kind of get that this is a pretty uncreative gift, and many prefer to gift an actual item that can hold some sentimental value to the recipient. Well, fear not, that’s where I come in! Let’s briefly take a closer look at what to buy for individual types of gamers based on their age, preferences or gaming hardware! In addition, I’m also going to be giving you an example of what not to buy in the same category, so that ought to be fun! Anyway, let’s get on with the show!

For PlayStation/Xbox Gamers

Do Buy: A PS+/Xbox Live Gold Membership
Don’t Buy: Any game that just seems interesting because it has a fun cover

Both PlayStation and Xbox (across their iterations) offer a subscription system called PlayStation Plus and Xbox Live Gold, respectively. The subscription is not mandatory, but trust me, it’s a really great idea to have it, since it’s required for online play and also gives you free games every single month, alongside a myriad of other bonuses (for example, PS+ gives you discounts in the store and allows you to upload your save files online so that you can retrieve them in case you accidentally delete them). And trust me – another year of subscription is ALWAYS necessary. Personally, my grandparents always give me a £40 gift card for my local videogame store, and I always, without fail, spend it on a yearly PS+ subscription simply because it’s something that I will always need – think of it as putting oil in your car. It’s the most practical gaming gift you can possibly give! It’s honestly much better than what many people who don’t know a lot about games do, which is walk into a store, ask “Do you have any games for PlayStation?”, purchase the first PlayStation 3 game whose cover they like and then it turns out their grandson or whatever has a PlayStation 4 which can’t play PS3 games, and even if it could the game they chose is just complete garbage, and let’s just say there’s a very good reason why I’ve been getting gift cards from my grandparents lately.

For Younglings

Do Buy: Whatever The Retailer Recommends
Don’t Buy: Anything based on movies or that blatantly panders to children

Okay, the world of children’s entertainment is complicated. Most parents just assume that their kids are dumb and are going to watch whatever you put on TV for them as long as it has funny moving pictures (if you don’t believe me, just check out the myriad of horrible, lazy Disney sequels). It’s like we don’t even care what we put in our children’s brains! I mean, can you imagine if we said that about other stuff? “Pfft, let’s just feed our children cheap half-baked stuff from the dollar store, I mean, they’re only kids!” Yeah, my point is, this is dumb and kids deserve better entertainment, in both their movies and their videogames. Just like there’s a whole slew of terrible animated movies that simply rely on parents buying them to shut up a crying toddler, there’s an even bigger slew of terrible games which aim to do… Well, exactly the same thing. “Barbie’s Horse Adventure”, “Hannah Montana” and “My Baby Girl” are but a few of the titles that are done on the cheap, with the hopes that they’ll be bought by ignorant parents. Don’t be ignorant, guys and gals! So, what do you buy instead? Simple – walk into your local videogame store, talk to the clerk and ask them what game they’d recommend for your child. Trust me, videogame store clerks are typically the biggest nerds you can find, and most of them would be overjoyed to recommend your kid a good game! Do they like cute puppies, but aren’t allowed to have one in the house, for whatever reason? Get them “Nintendogs”! Do they like cartoony action? Get them “Rayman: Legends”! Do they play a lot of “Minecraft” and wish there was an animated series based on it? Get them “Minecraft: Story Mode”! Do they like the Avengers? Get them “Lego Avengers”! Do they like to collect toys? Get them the latest “Skylanders” set, which brings their toys to life on the screen! There’s DOZENS of fantastic games to choose from, so please ask for help if you’re uncertain and by all means never, ever purchase a game just because it’s on the shelf!

For Shooter Fans

Do Buy: Overwatch
Don’t Buy: Anything else

I mean, come on, you guys, this one should be obvious. If your gamer is into shooters, or competitive games at all, buy them “Overwatch” on their system of choice. Right now. The only reason why you shouldn’t buy it is if they already own it. “Overwatch” is the most fun you can have with a competitive game these days, and even I, who generally doesn’t like competitive games at all, still find a whole lot to love in it.

For Retro Games Enthusiasts

Do Buy: AVS
Don’t Buy: NES Classic

Right now, everybody’s going bananas over the “NES Classic” – a tiny machine from Nintendo that costs £50 (supposedly) and plays 30 of your favorite classic NES games such as “Excitebike”, also known as the game where you press right to win, or “Ice Climbers”, also known as the game which is only fun for maybe about 3 minutes, or “Simon’s Quest” and “Zelda II”, also known as the absolute worst in their beloved franchises. Fun stuff. And sure, there’s a couple of great games in there, like “Super Mario Bros. 3”, but a whooooooole lot of classics are just not there – and since the Classic doesn’t have the ability to add new games, you’re stick with the underwhelming selection. Not to mention, the bloody thing is sold out everywhere, so if you want to get one you need to cough up a whole lot more than £50, with the US retailer Walmart asking for $500 (or ~£400) per unit! It’s ridiculous! So if you have a friend who’s just way more into nostalgia than is healthy, or have a child that would like to try the classics, I’ll tell you what you do. You don’t buy a crap console for w*nkers for 8 times what it’s worth. Instead, you go out and you buy an AVS, which is exactly like the NES Classic, except good. Rather than coming with pre-built games, you need to buy cartridges for it, but on the plus side, it reads any and all NES carts you can find (including the grey ones popular in the US and parts of the UK AND the smaller, orange ones popular in Europe, Japan and other parts of the UK), and considering how dirt-cheap NES games are these days, you can definitely get your kid an AVS and a couple of really good games he or she will actually enjoy instead of something filled 30 games you can’t change, most of which are garbage.

How To Get Into Comic Books?

admin

ComicsThanks to the Marvel Cinematic Universe and DC’s extremely poor attempts at copying it, comic book properties have never been more successful! Ten years ago, nobody but hardcore comic book nerds knew Iron Man’s real name, or Harley Quinn’s origin, or even the simple fact that Thor is a Marvel superhero and not just a Norse god. Today, we’re all familiar with Tony Stark’s eccentric antics in and out of his suit, we all know about the abusive relationship between the artist formerly known as Dr. Harleen Quinzel and her puddin’, and many of us ponder what would happen if a baby tried to lift Mjolnir. But how many of us have actually sat down and read a comic book featuring any of those characters? Despite the fact that only his three solo movies – not counting all the other movies he’s appeared in or had starring roles in – made over $2.5 billion dollars at the box office, the latest issue of Iron Man’s solo comic book series that I could find any sales information about, “Invincible Iron Man #11”, sold only 50,000 copies. But honestly, we can’t really hold that against the Armored Avenger, since comics don’t generally sell that much in the first place. The best-selling comic of the same month, “Justice League #1”, sold only 200,000 copies, and that’s considering the fact that #1 issues typically sell a lot more than their subsequent parts.

A big part of the reason why comics are so unpopular in comparison to movies is that anyone can watch a movie. You can see “Iron Man” and understand it, you can see “Doctor Strange” this November and understand it, hell, you can even see big ensemble movies like “The Avengers” or “Captain America: Civil War” and understand them, even if you’ll lose some of the nuance. You can’t really do that with comics. Right now, Marvel Comics are having an event called “Civil War II”, in which Iron Man and Captain Marvel go to war over a young Inhuman who can see the future. If you’ve got no idea who those characters are, then you’ve got no hope of following “Civil War II”, and it REALLY doesn’t help that anyone who is anyone shows up in this crossover (Thanos, the Guardians of the Galaxy, Hulk, Hawkeye, the X-Men…), so a casual reader has no chance of getting into it. Quite a lot of comics have been built up like that, which alienates audiences.

But fear not, dear readers, because while it may be a bit intimidating, it’s certainly not impossible to get into comics! In fact, it might be easier than you think! Let me explain what you need to do. Getting into Marvel is actually absurdly easy, since they have PLENTY of series that are good jumping-on points for new readers. While the aforementioned “Civil War II” and “Invincible Iron Man” aren’t really good places to go, since as I said they tend to rely on a LOT of pre-existing characters and lore that you may not be familiar with, a lot of Marvel’s series tend to exist on their own while only occasionally crossing over with other properties. Take “Ms. Marvel”, for example, in which a young comic book nerd finds herself transformed into an Inhuman overnight and takes on the mantle that Captain Marvel used to have. You don’t really need to be familiar with neither the Inhumans nor Captain Marvel to understand Ms. Marvel’s adventures, as both of them are explained quite well within her own narrative. Other series, such as “The Runaways”, “Sentinel”, “Young Avengers”, “New Avengers” (the 2015 series), “Avengers Academy” and its sequel “Avengers Arena”, “Alias”, “Hawkeye” (the 2012 series) and many more operate on the same principle, allowing readers to easily get into their main narratives while occasionally introducing characters who may be relevant in other titles. For example, let’s say that you decide to read “Hawkeye” (as you should, because it’s one of the greatest comic book runs of all time) and fall in love with Kate Bishop, the female Hawkeye and Clint Barton’s partner. You can then decide to trace her roots back to “Young Avengers”, and that series can introduce you to Hulkling and Wiccan, who continue their adventures in “New Avengers”. So, just like that, very naturally, you’re exploring the Marvel universe little by little. And the whole process is made absurdly easy by the fact that 95% of all comics Marvel has ever published are available on Marvel Unlimited for an absurdly cheap Netflix-style subscription fee, so all you have to do is sign up for that incredible service and start digging! If you don’t like a particular series, move onto another – as you read, you’re bound to encounter plenty of characters and teams that you’re interested in.

DC, on the other hand, is a bit more complicated, since A) they don’t have a subscription service like Marvel Unlimited, so you need to take a lot more risks with their comics, and B) they really like to reboot their universe every few years, with the last time being just a few weeks ago, with “Rebirth”. My advice to you would be to ignore “Rebirth” for the time being. Despite the fact that reviews for the “Rebirth” series have been excellent, there’s only 1 or 2 issues per series out at the moment, so that’s not going to really satisfy you in any way. Instead, I’d personally go back to the last reboot, the New 52, and start from there. The New 52 is of mixed quality, but I don’t think there’s anything in there that’s just awful, and best of all, most of their titles are very self-contained. For example, if you pick up “Suicide Squad”, you’re not going to get an event in the middle of it that derails the story, you’re just going to be reading about “Suicide Squad”. There are the occasional crossovers (“Suicide Squad” in particular did an excellent crossover with Resurrection Man, and the Bat-family titles like to cross paths every once in a while), but for the most part, just pick a superhero and have fun with them! If you like the Flash, start reading the Flash New 52 series. If you like Batman, go read Batman. There’s lots of great books to choose from, so just pick one and enjoy it! Or you can go for something a little more obscure, like “Animal Man” or “Gotham Academy”, both of which are excellent! So, what are you waiting for? Go read some comics!

Yes, That Happened in “Killing Joke”, Get Over It

admin

the-killing-joke“The Killing Joke” is a classic Batman story written by one of comics’ most influential authors, the one and only Alan Moore (who has also penned “Watchmen” and “V for Vendetta”, among many, many more). It defined the Batman mythos for YEARS to come, giving the Joker a more-or-less definitive origin and transforming the failing-in-popularity Batgirl into the much more popular Oracle. The original graphic novel, albeit a bit on the short side, keeps being printed and reprinted to this day, with fans still debating over its ambiguous ending. Was the Joker right? Can one really bad day truly drive a person insane? Was that person Batman, who finally snapped and killed his arch-nemesis (echoing the sentiment he had expressed earlier in the story about their struggle ending by one of them killing the other), or did he listen to Gordon and bring him in by the book? Argh, I could go on and on about this story, but I don’t need to – countless others, from regular fans all the way to comic book writer Grant Morrison have thrown their own two cents into it. No, right now, I want to focus on a little something else.

Recently (and by that I mean “this week”), an animated movie based on “The Killing Joke” was released featuring the voices of Kevin Conroy as Batman, Mark Hamill as Joker and Tara Strong as Batgirl – who have been voicing these characters since the 90s. And, surprise, surprise, the actual part that is a straight adaptation of “The Killing Joke” is actually really great! The performances are great, the character designs are awesome, the sets are unbelievably creative, and the changes actually enhance the story rather than detract from it. But since “The Killing Joke” is a very short book, the filmmakers added a 30-minute prologue focusing on Batgirl, and that… Has been divisive. io9 called the movie’s portrayal of Batgirl a “frankly sexist character assassination”, and fans haven’t been much kinder – if you go to any review of the movie, even ones that don’t mention this in particular (such as this one by Chris Stuckmann), you’re undoubtedly going to see one thing being brought up over and over again. And I’m here to set the record straight.

Yes, Batgirl has sex with Batman. Get over it.

I mean, really, the outrage over this one plot point in particular is ridiculous, and the arguments against it – even more so. I mean, a “character assassination”, really? I mean, it’s not like Batgirl’s portrayed as a brainless bimbo who does nothing but pine for her man throughout the entire movie – she’s clearly capable, extremely intelligent, a better detective/tech expert than even Batman… Her character is there, it’s just that the director has decided to give her *gasp* a flaw! Throughout the movie, it’s made rather clear that it’s not really Batman that Batgirl likes – it’s the power fantasy that Batman provides. Meanwhile, Batman himself sees this in her and knows just how dangerous that mindset is, which is why he distances himself from her. Those characters are human – they make mistakes and have very real emotions which aren’t always rational. This isn’t a “character assassination” – this is precisely what the fabled “strong female character” should be like!

You guys wanna know what a real assassination of a female character looks like? Look no further than the 2004 “Catwoman” movie. Remember that? The titular Catwoman is a flirty cat burglar with a love-hate relationship with Batman who likes to play by her own rules, but will always do the right thing when it counts. The protagonist of the movie is… Well, none of those things. At all. Like, not even close. She’s a straight-up superhero with cat powers who fights against an evil corporation. Hell, they couldn’t even get Catwoman’s name right – she’s called Selina Kyle, not Patience Phillips or whatever. When your movie depicts a beloved comic book character so poorly that even the actress who brought her to life apologized (when accepting her Razzie award, no less), then you know that THAT is a character assassination. Batgirl having sex with Batman is not the problem. Not every female character has to be a perfect, pure snowflake in order to be “strong” – they can be strong while making mistakes. Please don’t halt so many years of progress when it comes to depictions of female characters just because you can’t accept that a woman can be flawed.

Is “The Avengers” The Best Slot Ever?

admin

Avengers SlotOkay, okay, fine, I know – I’ve spoken about the Avengers time and time again, but I can’t help it! I love them! They’re my favorite superhero team of all time! While other kids were all about the Justice League, or the X-Men, or the Fantastic Four (hahaha, I’m just kidding, nobody but the most hardcore comic book nerds – of which I am one – likes the Fantastic Four), I was all about Iron Man, Captain America, Hawkeye, Ms. Marvel, Black Panther and the rest of Earth’s Mightiest Heroes. “New Avengers” was one of the first comic books I ever picked up, and it introduced me to some characters who are now fairly well-known thanks to their live-action appearances, like Luke Cage and Jessica Jones. “Civil War” – a very important Avengers-centric event – was the first comic book event that I actually followed as it happened, and for that reason it still holds a very special place in my heart. “Avengers: Earth’s Mightiest Heroes” is one of my favorite cartoons of all time, and not a day goes by in which I don’t curse the person who canceled it and replaced it with that “Avengers Assemble” crap. And of course, it goes without saying that the fact that the movies are among the finest superhero entertainment to have ever been released fills me with immense joy!

But there’s another piece of “Avengers” media that often goes overlooked outside of the gambling fields when maybe it shouldn’t. I am, of course, talking about “The Avengers” slot machine, developed by Playtech around the time the movie came out. I know that plenty my readers are into gambling (I’m looking at those metrics and reading your messages), but for those of you who don’t know, “The Avengers” at one point actually became one of the most popular slots in the UK, raking in millions in profits. Yes, one of the most popular online slot machines in one of the meccas of online gambling bore the faces of Iron Man, Thor and the rest of the Marvel superheroes. How friggin’ cool is that? Though it begs the question, why did this slot become so popular rather than literally any of the others listed on this website? Honestly, I think it’s because it did everything right.

Now, your average slot isn’t expected to rake in a whole lot of cash. Each online slot has something called a Return to Player percentage, which is always really high (over 91%, more often than not over 95%) and essentially ensures that a certain percentage of all money deposited within the slot by the players will be dispensed back to the players. It may not be to the same player, exactly (so person A could deposit a tenner and come out with nothing while person B might also deposit a tenner and come out with a twenty), but essentially, the overwhelming majority of money that players invest won’t even be smelled by the developers of the slot, which is why online slots are typically made on the super cheap. Have you ever wondered why most online slots look terrible, with cringeworthy animations that seem like they were made by a 5th grader? This is why – it’s a cost-cutting measure. The only way most slots can turn in a profit is to be as cheap as humanly possible.

But not “The Avengers”. That slot actually goes all out. It’s got great graphics, great music, voice acting, lots of bonus games and even a progressive jackpot! It’s got literally everything that a slot could possibly need and then some! It’s pretty obvious that developer Playtech spared no expense on this particular slot (unlike their other Marvel slots, many of which have quite obviously cut corners). It’s well-made, it’s got a lot of love for the source material in it, it’s jam-packed with features, and it’s based on a movie that made over a billion dollars at the box office! Honestly, is it any surprise that “The Avengers” became so popular?

Why Do Videogame Movies Fail?

admin

game console2016 was supposed to be the year of videogame adaptations. Finally, after years and years and years of failures dating all the way back to 1993 with the release of the utterly atrocious “Super Mario Bros.” movie, directors, producers and studios have attempted to bring beloved videogame properties to life on the big screen, with no luck. Even the best videogame movies, such as “Mortal Kombat”, are still only considered good by videogame movie standards and fail when measured up to literally anything else. This year, things were meant to change, damn it! We were going to have “Warcraft”, “Ratchet & Clank”, “Assassin’s Creed”, “Angry Birds”, and they were all going to be good! Well, okay, maybe not that last one, but things were looking up! As it turns out, no, they’re not – “Ratchet & Clank” was critically panned, proving once and for all that a fun game does not necessarily make a good movie, and according to early reviews “Warcraft” might be even worse. It really says something when friggin’ “Angry Birds” is currently the highest rated videogame movie of all time, doesn’t it? I still have hope for “Assassin’s Creed”, which is due to release in December, but considering the fact that A) most of it is set in modern times as opposed to a historical setting like in the games, B) it comes out mere days after “Star Wars”, and C) that horrible Kanye West song somehow made it into the trailer makes me think that the people behind it have no idea what they’re doing.

But why are things turning out like this? Why do people seem unable to make good videogame movies? Some people say that videogames are simply unfilmable – they’re a different medium entirely, and once you remove the interactive element you lose most of the immersion. No offense, but these people are idiots. First of all, books and comics are also a different medium, but they’ve given us some damn fine movies over the years. Second of all, if games are only ever entertaining if they’re being played, then why is the Let’s Play culture thriving so much? Millions of people are flocking towards famous YouTubers in order to watch them play videogames. If the interactive element was truly so important for immersion, then surely the Let’s Play culture would’ve made no sense?

If you ask me, the big problem stems from the fact that filmmakers simply don’t understand their source material properly. They don’t understand the significance of what they’re filming, and how to properly narrate it to their audience. For example, the way you build suspense in a game is a lot different from the way you do it in a movie, which is why a lot of horror game adaptations (such as “Silent Hill” or “Resident Evil”) just don’t work. The goal of the filmmaker is to narrate the same experience to his or her audience that the player would get from playing the game. Instead, what directors are trying to do is take elements from the game and just shove them in the movie for no reason other than to say “Hey, remember THAT from the game? It’s here too!”, but without understand just WHY they’re there. The “Silent Hill” movie I mentioned is like a goldmine for this kind of thing, as I could literally spend an entire article writing about it, but let’s just limit it to two examples, shall we? “Silent Hill” is an adaptation of the first “Silent Hill” game – remember that, that is important. In “Silent Hill 3”, after the main character Heather loses her father, she goes on a car ride to the town of Silent Hill and has a discussion about the fact that her life as she knew it is basically over. All the while, the song “Letter From The Lost Days” plays in the background, which, as you can hear, is rather relevant to the conversation. In the “Silent Hill” movie, the main character takes her daughter to Silent Hill with her car, and the same song plays, but since the context is so different the choice of music doesn’t really make sense. Similarly, one of the most famous characters from the series is the eponymous Pyramid Head, who first appeared in “Silent Hill 2” as a manifestation of main character James’ guilt over having committed a murder, with a design inspired by a painting of an executioner. In the movie, Pyramid Head is simply a demon who shows up for a little bit and chases the protagonist around for absolutely no reason other than for the director to wink to the fans and say “See, this is just like the games!” As you may have noticed, both of those examples include trying to shove things into an adaptation of the first “Silent Hill” game which weren’t even part of it in the first place.

Will we ever see a good videogame movie? Hopefully! The adaptation of the game “The Last of Us”, which is generally regarded as one of the best games of all time, was written by the same person who wrote and directed the game, so when, or rather if that ever gets off the ground we might be looking at the world’s first great videogame movie. Fingers crossed!

Marvel’s Civil War – Differences Between the Movie and the Comic

admin

civil warMarvel’s 2006 event comic event “Civil War” was one of the company’s biggest ones, scoping across the entire Marvel universe. Pretty much every single Marvel hero who was alive and on Earth at the time was involved in one way or another, whether in the main books or in their own spinoff series. At the time, “Civil War” received universal critical acclaim for completely shattering and reshaping the Marvel universe and presenting a fresh new perspective on the hero vs hero conflict (remember – up until that point, the classic formula of hero vs hero fights involved only fighting for a bit before teaming up against a bad guy, and there was no bad guy in sight during “Civil War”). While fan opinion on the story is more mixed these days (and with good reason – some of the content within is pretty questionable), the fact that its 2016 movie adaptation holds a 90% on “Rotten Tomatoes” just goes to show that the core of the storyline still works ten years later. But obviously the Marvel Cinematic Universe is much different from the Marvel Comics Universe, so why don’t we take a closer look at both stories and compare the similarities and the differences? Be warned – there will be plenty of spoilers ahead!

For all of the differences to the source material, there’s also a lot of symbolic similarities to the comic books, too – for example, both the movie and the comic open with a young hero screwing up and accidentally causing a catastrophe. In the movie, that hero is the newest Avenger Scarlet Witch, who mistakenly sends suicide bomber Crossbones into a building full of people. In the comics, though, the perps are a little-known team known as the New Warriors who decide to take on a team of supervillains way out of their league while being filmed for a reality TV show, and as a result cause an explosion that kills hundreds of people, including dozens of children. The result is the same, though – the government passes a bill which requires superheroes to take responsibility for their actions. But the law in question is also different – in the movies, the Sokovia Accords is limited only to the Avengers and sets to essentially turn them into a private UN task force. As a result, heroes operating outside of the Avengers (such as Daredevil or Jessica Jones) wouldn’t really face any repercussions for their crime fighting other than maybe being charged with vigilantism (as if any superhero was ever sent to jail for that), which isn’t the case in the comics, where the Superhuman Registration Act applies to every superpowered individual. It requires them to not only start working as, essentially, agents of SHIELD, but to also register their secret identities within a SHIELD database – a database which can, potentially, be hacked, thus placing their loved ones in danger.

In both the movie and the comics, Iron Man starts supporting the law after a mother confronts him and blames him for the death of her son, while Captain America becomes a fugitive after choosing to oppose him. In both mediums, there are scenes in which the heroes are this close to reaching a solution, only to have it all go to hell, but other than that, the similarities in the first act are few and far in between. Characters that are prominent in the movie, such as Black Panther, barely show up in the comics, and characters with huge roles in the comics, like Spider-Man (who reveals his secret identity to the world in support of the Superhuman Registration Act) only shows up in the movie for one fight scene. Bucky, the Winter Soldier, isn’t present in the comics at all, while he’s the driving force of the movie. The first big superhero fight scene is also very different – in the movie, Tony’s team of heroes corner Cap’s at the airport, while in the comics Cap is lured to a burning factory. Both fights end with a member of Cap’s team growing gigantic (Ant-Man in the movie and Goliath in the comics), but while Ant-Man is defeated “Empire Strikes Back”-style in the movie, Goliath is killed by a clone of Thor in the comics. In the movie, the only casualty of the fight is Rhodey, who survives, but loses the use of his legs.

While in the movie Captain America manages to escape, at the cost of most of his team, in the comics Tony’s team is so shocked by Goliath’s death that they pretty much let Captain America and most of his team escape. From then on, a lot of heroes change sides – Sue Storm, the Invisible Woman, is disgusted by Tony Stark’s actions and leaves her family in order to support Captain America, while several of Steve’s teammates leave out of fear of ending up dead or on the run for the rest of their lives. In the movie, the only person who switches sides is Black Widow, who betrays Tony’s team and then disappears. In both mediums, Cap’s teammates (at least the ones that refuse to register) are imprisoned – in the comics, they’re locked up in a special prison in another dimension (because comics), while in the movie the prison is simply underwater.

That prison is precisely where the comics sets its climax, where Captain America manages to release all of his teammates, beginning a final offensive against Iron Man’s forces. The movie never quite tops the spectacle of the airport fight, though, instead preferring for a simpler, more emotionally-packed fight between Iron Man and Cap & Bucky. The fights, and subsequently the stories, end completely differently – in the movie, Steve manages to completely overwhelm his friend, literally and figuratively breaking his heart before leaving his shield behind, busting his teammates out of prison and forming the Secret Avengers with them. In the comics, though, in the midst of battle Steve realizes that they’re just fighting for the sake of fighting and not to protect the people like they’d swore to do, so he surrenders to the authorities and is later assassinated on his way to his trial. If you ask me, that might have been a stronger ending for the movie, but I guess they wanted to leave Cap alive for “Infinity War” (not that anything has ever stopped Marvel from bringing people back from the dead before).

Anyway, I hope you had fun learning about all the differences between the comic and the movie! Obviously, since we’re talking about two entirely different universes I couldn’t list every single little thing, but this should give you a pretty good idea and allow you to brag to your friends when you go and see the movie again for the third time.

My Rant About the Star Wars Expanded Universe

admin

maullockdownI’ve been reading “Star Wars” novels for a veeeeery long time. Admittedly, most were by Timothy Zahn, and admittedly, some were better than others, but at the end, all of them, the good and the bad, have done nothing but increase my love for the “Star Wars” universe. I read about the trials Luke Skywalker had to go through in order to rebuild his Jedi Academy, about his unlikely marriage to Mara Jade and about the attack of the Yuuzhan Vong. True, I also read some ridiculous stuff such as how the Emperor transferred his consciousness into a clone body and seduced Luke to the dark side or something (I don’t know, I generally try to keep the bad stories to the back of my mind), but hey, nothing good is good all the time. Even today, I continue reading “Star Wars” books with joy.

Except there’s one problem. None of them even matter anymore.

Not too long after Disney bought Lucasfilm for $4 billion, they announced that the entire Expanded Universe – all the books, all the games, all the audioplays and comics, will no longer be considered canon within the new “Star Wars” universe. And don’t get me wrong, I understand that decision, I really do. The “Star Wars” canon is chock-full of materials, starting at millions of years before “A New Hope” and ending at hundreds of years afterwards. Disney wants to make a whole lot of movies – three more episodes and at least three side stories (the first of which, “Rogue One”, will be coming out this December). And if they want to retain the creative freedom to do things their way and still keep fans guessing and surprised, then they have no choice but to eliminate the old Expanded Universe and start fresh. I understand that, and honestly, I probably would’ve done the same.

What I don’t understand is why the entire Expanded Universe had to go. I mean, come on, the “Knights of the Old Republic” games and the “Star Wars: The Old Republic” MMO take place in the “Star Wars” universe’s distant past! Why did they have to get rid of that? Even if Disney wanted to set a movie in the time of the Old Republic (which I sincerely doubt they do), they could’ve easily done so without contradicting the games! Or what about “Star Wars: The Force Unleashed”, which was one of the biggest “Star Wars” projects ever with a book, comic and two games? Everyone liked the story (well, at least that of the first game), and elements from it have even been made canon within the new TV show “Star Wars: Rebels”, so why not just go out and make it canon? It doesn’t interfere with anything! Hell, the book I’m reading right now, “Maul: Lockdown”, takes place way before “Episode I” and features a character that is actually very prominent in the new canon, Darth Maul. Making the book canon would’ve given him some history, which he doesn’t really have at the moment.

Just because I understand this decision doesn’t mean I approve of how it’s enforced. I think that a team at Disney should’ve seriously sat down, evaluated all the major stories and, maybe with the help of the fans, cherry-picked what is canon and what isn’t. Sure, 100% of the material set after Episode VI should be removed, but there were some really awesome things from before that could’ve been salvaged. At the very least the aforementioned “Star Wars: Rebels” seems to be nodding a lot to the Expanded Universe, but nods and canon are two entirely different things.

Welcome To Daily Dose of Lit!

admin

If you’re here, that means you’re probably looking for one of two things – a daily dose of literature (book recommendations, reviews, articles about fiction and non-fiction, etc.) or the daily blog of a guy named Lit. I’m happy to say that you’re right either way! Hi, my name is Ryan Lit, and this is my daily blog where I’m going to be talking about books (I usually read about 60+ books a year, so you can say that there’s plenty to talk about), as well as other things that I come across which I find interesting – comic books, games, movies, roleplaying games, online casino, LARP, comic cons, you name it! Anything that could possibly be considered geeky will be covered here! I’ll generally describe this aspect of my life and not my personal one, as I know that nobody likes bragging or whining, but that doesn’t mean I won’t say a few words about myself every once in a while! So, welcome to Daily Dose of Lit, and I hope you enjoy your stay!